A gestalt shift in a given object results from a gestell shift in receiving subject.

A shift in experienced wholes (perceived or conceived) results from enceptive structures. The enceptive structures are elaborately inter-nested containers for experiential content. Enceptions cannot be comprehended because it is by them that comprehension knows. We know this tree solely by its fruit — the container by its content. …Kingdoms/Malkut, palaces/hekhalot, rooms, wineskins…

Our lungs are an everted tree. By the lung’s capaciousness, we breathe air.

Ruach is an everted tree. By Ruach’s tzimtzum, Neshamah breathes inspiration.

As every subject is an everted objectivity, a gestell is an everted field of possible gestalts.

A Heideggerian will hate this use of gestell. I will counter that technicity is only one possible gestell, and that another gestell is possible and necessary. In fact, to [mis]quote Heidegger himself, “only [this] can save us.”