I think initially my preference strongly leans toward technique, however upon second thought I would have to admit that I have serious objections to the assumption that being takes place within a scenario where both abstractions can be considered but only a single one exists. I would think in almost every situation confronted with any number of potential interpretations that an intellectual invention of any sort (Even a completely fictional one) which exists a singular synthesis of all possible interpretations would be the most useful….as well as being the most fulfilling to all other values of judgment as well.
I think initially my preference strongly leans toward technique, however upon second thought I would have to admit that I have serious objections to the assumption that being takes place within a scenario where both abstractions can be considered but only a single one exists. I would think in almost every situation confronted with any number of potential interpretations that an intellectual invention of any sort (Even a completely fictional one) which exists a singular synthesis of all possible interpretations would be the most useful….as well as being the most fulfilling to all other values of judgment as well.